There have been theories that suggest that key factors are influence and money - jobs which have a wide ranging influence, and those which are linked to financial power houses (NB I don't here mean high salaries, but people who have influence on how money is spent - budget holders and the like) are more likely to be prestigious. So power is usually important, but there are those who think that the causal relationship is the other way round - ie people in high prestige jobs are powerful, rather than that power leads to high prestige. I was thinking that academics are often asked to take on powerful roles (advisory committees, influencing policy etc) even though their jobs in themselves are neither powerful nor in charge of large sums of money.
Education and skill are other factors that are frequently mentioned. Most high prestige jobs require extensive training and / or high levels of education to enter.
So, I can reveal that the most prestigious occupations are:
- Physician
- Lawyer
- Computer systems analyst
- Post-secondary teacher
- Physicist or astronomer
- Chemist
- Chemical engineer
- Architects
- Biological or life scientist
- Physical scientist
- Dentist
- Judge
- Engineer
- Chief executive
- Geologist
- Psychologist
- Manager, medicine
- Aerospace engineer
- Clergy
- Civil engineer
Zhou, Q. (2005) The Institutional Logic of Occupational Prestige Ranking: Reconceptualization and Reanalyses American Journal of Sociology 111 (1) 90 - 140
No comments:
Post a Comment